The Three Flavours of Conspiracism
It is my personal belief that Conspiracists can be drawn into three broad camps. Apart from intractable arguments over the details of various conspiracies, the main schismatic element of conspiracism comes down to how the conspiracist approaches the concept of the supernatural and its relationship to their worldview and ideas.The particular quote from Alex Jones that struck me as being particularly useful in illustrating this concept was this:
Jones is what I like to call a Mundane conspiracy theorist. He never explicitly invokes magic or too obviously advanced technology (such as holograms or anti-gravity devices) in his discourse; yet, as this quote shows, he can integrate many of the theories of, for example, David Icke ('the elite are really child-eating vampire lizards') simply by re-casting them as 'mere beliefs' of the Cabal. The Mundane conspiracist can be thought of as being similiar in approach to a techno-thriller or a James Bond style spy movie; they generally operate (at least in terms of physical events) in the realm of the highly implausible but seemingly possible, though there are various ideas (such as 'Manchurian Candidate' style mind control) common among these sorts that are fairly firmly in the realm of science fiction. It is worth noting however that even these sorts of conspiracists tend to incorporate less overt supernatural elements, which we may understand in the context of our next sort of conspiracist.
The elite believe that they are communicating with interdemensional creatures and they believe that they have to kill everyone to get to the super-technology. The psychopath cosmology is not to have kids and live on through them but that you must kill and enslave people to get ahead. Prove you're evil, prove you're hateful - you're just this God killing everyone.
The Theistic conspiracist operates from within the context of Christianity, or more rarely from the context of Islam or Mormonism, or very rarely indeed from Judaism, or some variation or fusion of one or more of these beliefs. Their particular flavour of religiosity can vary wildly, but tends towards abrahamic monotheism generally, and particularly the more idiosyncratic end of Protestantism, with a tendency towards highly literal, yet fanciful, interpretations of the bible and a strong anti-Catholic streak. The main thing that unites Theists, and an aspect of their thought which tends to resonate throughout the rest of conspiracism1, is a cosmology of personified Good and Evil (God and Satan), actively engaged in spiritual conflict, which for them provides the backdrop to the machinations of the cabal. In this view, the Cabal are the willing or unwilling dupes of Satan, working to prepare the world for the End of Days under the guise of a global Satanic state. The weaker versions of this found in other forms of conspiracism give us the least obvious, but most permeating supernatural aspects of the cabal; their superhuman malice, which drives them forward to carry out the most immoral schemes in the most unethical ways, and their superhuman corruption, which ensures not a single one of them ever feels a pang of guilt, remorse or shame about the whole thing.
The final variant is the Esoteric conspiracist. These are the conspiracists who retain a belief in the supernatural in some way (often understood through the lens of new-age pseudoscience) but reject the organising manichean framework of the Theists. Esotericists may well believe in a god, but it tends to be the deistic, platonic or gnostic sort of God, remote and unknowable. An important way to distinguish between them is that in the Theistic view, in line with various religious prophecies, the ultimate ascendancy and specific power of Good to triumph over Evil is assured; God will ultimately triumph, and he can empower individuals to triumph over the forces of Evil via their faith to call on his intercession. In the esoteric view this ultimate triumph is not so assured; good (or 'positive energy') can still overcome evil (or 'negative energy') but this energy is an abstract force, employed directly by conscious individuals using learnable techniques under the guidance of wise masters. The great drama of the Cabal thus becomes a reflection of a cosmic conflict between various groups, driven by ideology and the desire for resources. These groups may include various secret societies (including survivals of ancient civilisations), public national or religious groups, supernatural beings ('ascended masters', 'macrobes'), races or factions of interstellar or interdimensional aliens and so on. This is the wing of conspiracism in which many of the most recognisable 'nutty' aspects of conspiracism tend to reside: UFOs, shapeshifters, channelling and so on.
These three tendencies are not necessarily exclusionary, though they tend to be. Conspiracists can practice various sorts of syncretism, either deliberately, or through a lack of philosophical sophistication or rigour when it comes to their overall framing. Ultimately the three tendencies remain united within the intellectual structure of conspiracism. This is represented in the diagram below:
Thus, we come back to Jones' quote. Jones does not profess to believe in the occult, at least in the sense that he believes that black magicians can wield genuine supernatural powers. But he believes that the Cabal believes in the occult, and aliens, and thus anything that is to do with the occult or aliens can very neatly be folded into his worldview. Each major branch has a version of this sort of master strategy. Thus, we cannot easily isolate any part of Conspiracist lore from any other; just because someone does not believe in demons or aliens does not meant that ideas about demons or aliens cannot work their way into their thinking. Once you accept the premise of a grand conspiracy, the whole notion of a 'fringe' idea recedes, and the extremes become very much in reach.
1 Perhaps unsurprisingly given the dominant role of Christianity in Western thought.
2 This granular structure will become important in the future as we move on to the topic of conspiracist aesthetics.
